[Two models of thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical inpatients].
نویسندگان
چکیده
INTRODUCTION The risk of venous thromboembolism is equally high in medical patients admitted to the hospital and those treated in the surgery wards. Elderly people, who are immobilized due to heart failure, severe respiratory disease, ischemic stroke and cancer, represent patients at high risk of venous thrombosis. Current recommendations concerning antithrombotic prophylaxis do not specify the duration of prophylaxis in patients treated in the internal wards. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two models of thromboprophylaxis with nadroparin in medical inpatients hospitalized for acute illnesses. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 300 consecutive medical patients (155 M, 145 F, mean age, 67.8 +/- 4 years) were randomly assigned in an open-label study to two groups (1:1). Patients received thromboprophylaxis with nadroparin s.c. only during bed immobilization (the first group) or for 10 additional days (the second group). The follow-up lasted for three months after the end of thromboprophylaxis. Proximal deep veins thrombosis of lower limbs and death were considered as endpoints. Adverse effects of thromboprophylaxis were assessed, especially major bleedings and thrombocytopenia. RESULTS Both groups did not differ with regard to demographic characteristics or thrombotic risk factors. During a further 3-month follow-up of all the 300 patients, death of unknown causes or deep-vein thrombosis were found in 17 (5.6%) patients, including 2 patients who suddenly died. No such events were observed during the thromboprophylaxis period. In medical patients receiving thromboprophylaxis for a longer period of time than the immobilization there was a tendency to lower occurrence of death and deep-vein thrombosis within the first months following hospitalization (12 vs. 5; p = 0.08). There were no major bleedings or thrombocytopenia in both groups during thromboprophylaxis and the subsequent follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The study confirmed the effectiveness and safety of thromboprophylaxis with nadroparin in acutely ill medical inpatients, suggesting additional benefits from prolonged use of low molecular weight heparins observed during the first months after hospitalization.
منابع مشابه
Cost effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis with a low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin in acutely ill medical inpatients.
OBJECTIVE To compare the cost effectiveness of prophylaxis with a low-molecular-weight heparin with that of prophylaxis with unfractionated heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical inpatients. STUDY DESIGN Cost-effectiveness analysis based on decision-tree model. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS A hypothetical cohort of 10 000 patients was assumed to receive eithe...
متن کاملOutcomes of thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin in medical inpatients
BACKGROUND Clinical trials have shown low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to be at least as safe and efficacious as unfractionated heparin (UFH) for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in acutely-ill medical inpatients. OBJECTIVE To compare clinical and economic outcomes among acutely-ill medical inpatients receiving the LMWH enoxaparin versus UFH prophylaxis in clinical practice. METHO...
متن کاملPrevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients: focus on the clinical utility of (low-dose) fondaparinux
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication among acutely ill medical patients hospitalized for congestive heart failure, acute respiratory insufficiency, rheumatologic disorders, and acute infectious and/or inflammatory diseases. Based on robust data from randomized controlled studies and meta-analyses showing a reduced incidence of VTE by 40% to about 60% with pharmacologic thromb...
متن کاملAdequacy of venous thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients (IMPART): multisite comparison of different clinical decision support systems.
BACKGROUND The adequacy of thromboprophylaxis prescriptions in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients needs improvement. OBJECTIVE To prospectively assess the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis adequacy of various clinical decision support systems (CDSS) with the aim of increasing the use of explicit criteria for thromboprophylaxis prescription in nine Swiss medical services. METHODS We rand...
متن کاملA new era for venous thromboembolism prevention in medical inpatients.
Haemost 2014; 112: 692-699. Historically, hospital-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been thought to mainly occur in surgical patients (1). Several phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated benefits and harms of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in this setting (1). Subsequently, acutely ill hospitalised medical patients have been recognised to be at increased risk o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej
دوره 117 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007